Re: OpenSSH 3.4p1 Trouble on SCO 5.0.5 -- use a VPN instead?
- From: jd <jd@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2008 15:46:34 -0700
On Wed, 26 Mar 2008, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
On 25 Mar, 09:12, Rob <r...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Steve,
what about using tcp_wrappers as to perform a "route delete" on the offending IP?
If memory serves, there was a porting of tcp_wrapper for SCO OS5 on a TLS076a
on the FTP site:
ftp://ftp.sco.com/pub/TLS/tls076a.tcp_wrappers.tar.Z
Hope this helps!
If our faithful here only needs SSH access from a small set of well-
maintained sites, that might work well. However, if he has clients who
use NAT on their ISP networks (such as AOL, which uses 10.* internal
addresses), than the tcp_wrapper will block the NAT and everything
behind the NAT server.
Then perhaps a VPN (such as OpenVPN) is a more appropriate solution for remote access, instead of SSH (although SSH can be used over the VPN).
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: OpenSSH 3.4p1 Trouble on SCO 5.0.5 -- use a VPN instead?
- From: Bill Campbell
- Re: OpenSSH 3.4p1 Trouble on SCO 5.0.5 -- use a VPN instead?
- References:
- OpenSSH 3.4p1 Trouble on SCO 5.0.5?
- From: Steve M. Fabac, Jr.
- Re: OpenSSH 3.4p1 Trouble on SCO 5.0.5?
- From: Bill Vermillion
- Re: OpenSSH 3.4p1 Trouble on SCO 5.0.5?
- From: Steve M. Fabac, Jr.
- Re: OpenSSH 3.4p1 Trouble on SCO 5.0.5?
- From: Rob
- Re: OpenSSH 3.4p1 Trouble on SCO 5.0.5?
- From: Nico Kadel-Garcia
- OpenSSH 3.4p1 Trouble on SCO 5.0.5?
- Prev by Date: Re: VMware, Ubuntu host with OS5.0.6 guest OS, networking
- Next by Date: SCO Openserver 5 netconfig command line operation
- Previous by thread: Re: OpenSSH 3.4p1 Trouble on SCO 5.0.5?
- Next by thread: Re: OpenSSH 3.4p1 Trouble on SCO 5.0.5 -- use a VPN instead?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|