Re: c.u.s. FAQ, take two

From: Stephane CHAZELAS (stephane_chazelas_at_yahoo.fr)
Date: 07/21/03


Date: 21 Jul 2003 10:26:55 GMT

joe@invalid.address wrote:
> This is what I've got so far. If there are no objections, I'll see
> about getting it accepted at comp.answers. Changes will always be
> possible.
[...]

Thanks Joe and everyone. Just to let you know I couldn't work on
questions I told you I would. I'll be away from a computer for
one month. I may comment on this when I'm back but you'll at
last be able to continue scripting whithout someone telling you
how how harmful it is for one month.

-- 
Stéphane


Relevant Pages

  • Re: McGinns disproof of Hardy-Weinberg
    ... Joe Felsenstein wrote: ... > Jim McGinn's objections are really objections ... > population genetics. ... > results, such as Hardy-Weinberg proportions. ...
    (sci.bio.evolution)
  • Re: c.u.s. FAQ, take two
    ... Stephane CHAZELAS writes: ... If there are no objections, ... > Thanks Joe and everyone. ... There are 10 kinds of engineers, those who understand binary and those ...
    (comp.unix.shell)

Loading