Re: Malfunction in bash script

From: Adrian (adrianne54_at_poczta.onet.pl)
Date: 01/29/04 

Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2004 19:53:30 +0100

>
>
> You generally dont need a delay. It is polite to give the
> mail server 1 second to take breath.
>
> Rather assembling all the SMTP commands like EHLO,DATA,QUIT
> you could simply pipe it to mail or /usr/lib/sendmail.
> These programs also generate a log message for every mail sent.
>
> All this has probably no influence on mail loss.
> Check your mail system. Do you have M$-Exchange somewhere?
> The SMTP gateways are famous for "swallowing" mails.
>

Thanks for answer.
Well, I need delay because When I say let's say 100 1-mb e-mails and
recipient has quota 10Mb he have to download messages on-the-time.
I've sended myself many e-mails but none of them were lost. And here
there's about one half.

Adrian

Relevant Pages

  • Re: delayed e-mails
    ... Wouldn't the fact that I receive delivery receipts almost immediately ... indicate that the exchange server is sending the e-mails without delay? ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs)
  • Re: Western Spode Fest
    ... Sorry for the further delay in telling my story. ... Damn DSL has been down for the last ... I got a couple e-mails out and then nothing. ... I am now a new member of the ...
    (rec.motorcycles.dirt)
  • Re: Incoming & outgoing emails
    ... Regarding the scanning of attachments in outbound e-mails (which Avira's ... This won't eliminate the delay to interrogate the attachments on inbound ...
    (alt.comp.anti-virus)
  • Re: Fedora-List & Greylisting
    ... > varies. ... It wouldn't simply be that the first delay was 30 minutes, ... two e-mails were sent 21 minutes later? ... James Wilkinson ...
    (Fedora)