Re: chpasswd
From: Stachu 'Dozzie' K. (cut-to-last-hypen-dozzie_at_dynamit.im.pwr.wroc.pl)
Date: 08/24/04
- Next message: Stephane CHAZELAS: "Re: How to send Standard Error to grep?"
- Previous message: Stuart: "Ksh array question"
- In reply to: Kevin Rodgers: "Re: chpasswd"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2004 12:38:43 +0000 (UTC)
On 2004-08-23, Kevin Rodgers wrote:
> Stachu 'Dozzie' K. wrote:
> > No, you understand it incorrectly. SUID bit *never* affects scripts,
> > only binaries (it's small simplification, try searching for suid-perl).
>
> That must depend on the OS, as I've used setuid and setgid scripts
> successfully (on SunOS/Solaris). But they were not owned by root.
Heh, good to know. Thanks.
> > It's security reason.
>
> I don't think setuid scripts are a security issue in general, just
> setuid root scripts.
I agree. All setuid executable files are a potential security risk, even
"stupid" ping.
-- Stanislaw Klekot
- Next message: Stephane CHAZELAS: "Re: How to send Standard Error to grep?"
- Previous message: Stuart: "Ksh array question"
- In reply to: Kevin Rodgers: "Re: chpasswd"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|