Re: Automating a tar -M... Looking for ideas
From: cyber0ne (ddonahue_at_ccs.neu.edu)
Date: 12/30/04
- Next message: cyber0ne: "Re: Automating a tar -M... Looking for ideas"
- Previous message: dfrench_at_mtxia.com: "Re: Automating a tar -M... Looking for ideas"
- In reply to: dfrench_at_mtxia.com: "Re: Automating a tar -M... Looking for ideas"
- Next in thread: dfrench_at_mtxia.com: "Re: Automating a tar -M... Looking for ideas"
- Reply: dfrench_at_mtxia.com: "Re: Automating a tar -M... Looking for ideas"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: 30 Dec 2004 09:03:41 -0800
Worth testing. My tape device doesn't physically eject tapes, but
rather (when given such a command) places the device into an offline
state. Hopefully, testing the status after "ejecting" won't detect the
still-in-the-device tape and think it's the next one. It will likely
work fine, but I'll have to test next time I'm at the console.
Sidebar: I've never seen the tctl command before, rather been using mt
instead. Being somewhat new to tape devices, is there a benefit of one
command over the other? Perusing the man pages shows them to be pretty
similar. If it's relevant, the device is a Seagate Travan TR-5 10/20
IDE drive and the system hosting it is an old PC running Slackware
Linux.
Thanks for the help :)
Regards,
David P. Donahue
ddonahue@ccs.neu.edu
- Next message: cyber0ne: "Re: Automating a tar -M... Looking for ideas"
- Previous message: dfrench_at_mtxia.com: "Re: Automating a tar -M... Looking for ideas"
- In reply to: dfrench_at_mtxia.com: "Re: Automating a tar -M... Looking for ideas"
- Next in thread: dfrench_at_mtxia.com: "Re: Automating a tar -M... Looking for ideas"
- Reply: dfrench_at_mtxia.com: "Re: Automating a tar -M... Looking for ideas"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|