Re: ls or 'ls -a' not display anything
- From: Bill Marcum <marcumbill@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2007 16:44:49 -0500
On 7 Feb 2007 13:37:31 -0800, wenmang
<wenmang@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
You don't have the current directory in your PATH, do you? What happens
Hi,
I encounter a problem when doing 'ls' or 'ls -a', there is nothing
being displayed. If I do:
cd ..; ls parentDir/, then everything is displayed, what happened?
thx. WM
if you type '/bin/ls' ?
--
All the existing 2.0.x kernels are to buggy for 2.1.x to be the
main goal.
-- Alan Cox
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: ls or 'ls -a' not display anything
- From: wenmang
- Re: ls or 'ls -a' not display anything
- References:
- ls or 'ls -a' not display anything
- From: wenmang
- ls or 'ls -a' not display anything
- Prev by Date: ls or 'ls -a' not display anything
- Next by Date: Re: modify variable
- Previous by thread: ls or 'ls -a' not display anything
- Next by thread: Re: ls or 'ls -a' not display anything
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|