Re: Syntax check for Shell Scripts
- From: bsh <brian_hiles@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2008 15:27:46 -0800 (PST)
On Feb 18, 4:44 am, Maxwell Lol <nos...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Geppo <geppore...@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
...Well, there is
sh -n
May I also suggest utilizing the same "set -n" from ksh93. It is very
enhanced to provide not only the obligatory static syntax checking,
but not portability commentary and deprecated usage, suggestions
and workarounds, etcetera.
ksh93 is free for non-commercial use.
=Brian
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Syntax check for Shell Scripts
- From: Chris Mattern
- Re: Syntax check for Shell Scripts
- References:
- Syntax check for Shell Scripts
- From: Geppo
- Re: Syntax check for Shell Scripts
- From: Maxwell Lol
- Syntax check for Shell Scripts
- Prev by Date: Re: Working directory in PATH
- Next by Date: Re: Working directory in PATH
- Previous by thread: Re: Syntax check for Shell Scripts
- Next by thread: Re: Syntax check for Shell Scripts
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
