Re: Weirdest shell behavior ever...
- From: Seebs <usenet-nospam@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 01 Sep 2010 20:11:38 GMT
On 2010-09-01, Ed Morton <mortonspam@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Beats me. Stating the obvious, though - this should have been written
almost entirely in awk or similar rather than shell in the first
place. The shell is an environment to call tools from, not a language
to program in. For simple text processing as you're doing in that
script, just use a text processing tool like awk.
Historical quirk; the usage environment allows my choice of any language,
as long as it's C, perl, or sh. There was some reason when I started for
which I picked sh. I do plan to rewrite that entirely, it ended up
being a lot more complicated than we originally thought it would be... I
didn't want to impose an additional requirement if I didn't have to (and
yes, I do see systems without perl once in a blue moon), and C is not really
my first choice for string manipulation, though in this case, maybe it should
Copyright 2010, all wrongs reversed. Peter Seebach / usenet-nospam@xxxxxxxxx
http://www.seebs.net/log/ <-- lawsuits, religion, and funny pictures
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fair_Game_(Scientology) <-- get educated!
I am not speaking for my employer, although they do rent some of my opinions.
- Prev by Date: Re: Weirdest shell behavior ever...
- Next by Date: Re: awk fields
- Previous by thread: Re: Weirdest shell behavior ever...
- Next by thread: Re: Weirdest shell behavior ever...