Re: Poor 2D Graphics performance
From: Michael Laajanen (michael_laajanen_at_yahoo.com)
Date: 07/03/03
- Next message: Eugene Yusim: "can't connect to modem with cu but tip works"
- Previous message: Lars Tunkrans: "Re: More Bad news"
- In reply to: Alan Coopersmith: "Re: Poor 2D Graphics performance"
- Next in thread: Alan Coopersmith: "Re: Poor 2D Graphics performance"
- Reply: Alan Coopersmith: "Re: Poor 2D Graphics performance"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Thu, 03 Jul 2003 17:36:12 GMT
HI
Alan Coopersmith wrote:
> Paul Gress <pgress@pb.net> writes in comp.unix.solaris:
> |directly connected to the graphics. I also believe Sun tried to correct
> |this with VIS (EOL'd) and XIL (endangered), and now with OpenGL and
>
> VIS is built in to every UltraSPARC processor and is definitely not
> EOL'ed. I think you've confused your acronyms there.
>
Alan, are there any VIS usage in the current GNOME port from SUN in
order to enhance the quite poor performance of current 2.0 release?
/michael
- Next message: Eugene Yusim: "can't connect to modem with cu but tip works"
- Previous message: Lars Tunkrans: "Re: More Bad news"
- In reply to: Alan Coopersmith: "Re: Poor 2D Graphics performance"
- Next in thread: Alan Coopersmith: "Re: Poor 2D Graphics performance"
- Reply: Alan Coopersmith: "Re: Poor 2D Graphics performance"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
