Re: solaris 9 IPQoS examples?
From: Anthony Mandic (re_at_hotmail.com)
Date: 09/08/03
- Next message: Alan Coopersmith: "Re: Is Solaris 9 free?"
- Previous message: Anthony Mandic: "Re: Solaris 9 Security Administrator Certification"
- In reply to: Logan Shaw: "Re: solaris 9 IPQoS examples?"
- Next in thread: Logan Shaw: "Re: solaris 9 IPQoS examples?"
- Reply: Logan Shaw: "Re: solaris 9 IPQoS examples?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: 08 Sep 2003 02:10:58 GMT
Logan Shaw <lshaw-usenet@austin.rr.com> wrote:
>
> I'm just saying, if I change the TCP stack on the local machine,
> how does this affect downloads much? No matter who initiated the
> TCP connection, it's still the remote end that is sending packets
> across the 56k link. It will, for the most part, send whatever
> it wants to send.
>
> Yes, you can do tricks (like pretending you dropped packets that
> you actually got) to trick the remote system into thinking that
> less bandwidth is available than you actually have. But still,
> if 5 packets arrive at once at the remote end, chances are it
> will send them across the link and saturate it for a moment.
I dunno. Can't you not send any response for a time (15s?)
while you wait to see if priority port traffic is still
occurring? If a firewall can NAT, you can keep track of
which TCP connections are on the poop list.
UDP isn't acknowledged, TCP requires an ACK or the like.
Saturation for "a moment" is not a problem in the overall picture.
-am © 2003
- Next message: Alan Coopersmith: "Re: Is Solaris 9 free?"
- Previous message: Anthony Mandic: "Re: Solaris 9 Security Administrator Certification"
- In reply to: Logan Shaw: "Re: solaris 9 IPQoS examples?"
- Next in thread: Logan Shaw: "Re: solaris 9 IPQoS examples?"
- Reply: Logan Shaw: "Re: solaris 9 IPQoS examples?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|