Re: Distributed Desktop on SunRays
From: neltik (neltik_at_lycos.com)
Date: 09/22/03
- Next message: JM: "Re: Solaris 8 accessing shared NT print queues"
- Previous message: Paul Eggert: "Re: How long does Sun have to live? (OT RANT)"
- In reply to: Thomas Dehn: "Re: Distributed Desktop on SunRays"
- Next in thread: Thomas Dehn: "Re: Distributed Desktop on SunRays"
- Reply: Thomas Dehn: "Re: Distributed Desktop on SunRays"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: 21 Sep 2003 20:22:42 -0700
"Thomas Dehn" <thomas-usenet@arcor.de> wrote in message
> Latency < 25 ms is the main requirement, the next
> most important is that your network doesn't drop packets.
> Network bandwidth usually isn't a bottleneck.
>
>
> Thomas
What's the best way to ensure that no packet is dropped? I believe
that the server's traffic handling mechanism has something to do with
it, apart from the underlying network protocol, of course.
Well, thanks everyone... I think all the info shared here is enough to
get me started in my research. See ya!
- Next message: JM: "Re: Solaris 8 accessing shared NT print queues"
- Previous message: Paul Eggert: "Re: How long does Sun have to live? (OT RANT)"
- In reply to: Thomas Dehn: "Re: Distributed Desktop on SunRays"
- Next in thread: Thomas Dehn: "Re: Distributed Desktop on SunRays"
- Reply: Thomas Dehn: "Re: Distributed Desktop on SunRays"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|