Re: statically linked precompiled expect binary for solaris
From: Darren Dunham (ddunham_at_redwood.taos.com)
Date: 10/28/03
- Next message: Alan Coopersmith: "Re: xprint"
- Previous message: David Schweiger: "Re: mozilla 1.2.1 displaying blank xml page"
- In reply to: lvirden_at_yahoo.com: "Re: statically linked precompiled expect binary for solaris"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2003 16:04:46 GMT
In comp.unix.solaris lvirden@yahoo.com wrote:
> According to Darren Dunham <ddunham@redwood.taos.com>:
> :In comp.unix.solaris TingChong <ma7777772@hotmail.com> wrote:
> :> I am looking for a statically linked precompiled expect
> :Most importantly, statically linked programs are *very* fragile in the
> :face of system updates.
> Weird - thinking back, I think I've found the opposite to be much more
> common - apps delivered by vendors, etc. with dynamic libraries or
> even ones built in house, but with one machine at a different set of
> patches than others, resulting in the app requiring shared libraries of
> specific versions that don't exist elsewhere. Whereas with statically
> linked apps, things seem to work.
I am speaking only of Solaris provided libraries, not vendor libraries.
System updates may change structures within the kernel for instance. If
it does, then the libraries will also be updated to reflect that. With
a static build, this will not be possible.
--
Darren Dunham ddunham@taos.com
Unix System Administrator Taos - The SysAdmin Company
Got some Dr Pepper? San Francisco, CA bay area
< This line left intentionally blank to confuse you. >
- Next message: Alan Coopersmith: "Re: xprint"
- Previous message: David Schweiger: "Re: mozilla 1.2.1 displaying blank xml page"
- In reply to: lvirden_at_yahoo.com: "Re: statically linked precompiled expect binary for solaris"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|