Re: Solaris compatibility on remote box - still fighting
From: Alan Coopersmith (alanc_at_alum.calberkeley.org)
Date: 11/29/03
- Next message: Alan Coopersmith: "Re: Qs about /usr/openwin/etc/keytables/*.kt.Z"
- Previous message: Mark M: "Re: what are the games you find most fun on sparc solaris?"
- In reply to: Sharon and James: "Re: Solaris compatibility on remote box - still fighting"
- Next in thread: Sharon and James: "Re: Solaris compatibility on remote box - still fighting"
- Reply: Sharon and James: "Re: Solaris compatibility on remote box - still fighting"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2003 17:10:41 +0000 (UTC)
"Sharon and James" <sjbright3@comcast.net> writes in comp.unix.solaris:
|After commenting out in .cshrc and .profile with #LD_LIBRARY_PATH,
|recompiling and ftp to remote host:
|bash-2.03$ ldd ./test1
|
| _2.3 => (file not found)
|
| vate_1.1 => (file not found)
|
| ibnsl.so.1 => (file not found)
|
| => /lib/ - Is a directory
|
| => /lib/ - Is a directory
Looks like your file is getting corrupted - are you ftp'ing in binary
mode? Does "sum test1" show the same checksums on both ends?
-- ________________________________________________________________________ Alan Coopersmith alanc@alum.calberkeley.org http://www.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU/~alanc/ aka: Alan.Coopersmith@Sun.COM Working for, but definitely not speaking for, Sun Microsystems, Inc.
- Next message: Alan Coopersmith: "Re: Qs about /usr/openwin/etc/keytables/*.kt.Z"
- Previous message: Mark M: "Re: what are the games you find most fun on sparc solaris?"
- In reply to: Sharon and James: "Re: Solaris compatibility on remote box - still fighting"
- Next in thread: Sharon and James: "Re: Solaris compatibility on remote box - still fighting"
- Reply: Sharon and James: "Re: Solaris compatibility on remote box - still fighting"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|