Re: Narrowed down bottlneck to disk, how can I find out which FS is being hammered? 100% utilization
From: Tonij (tonij67_at_hotmail.com)
Date: 04/28/04
- Next message: David Magda: "logadm package (Solaris 8)"
- Previous message: James Carlson: "Re: meaning of 1st column of output of "rpcinfo""
- In reply to: Darren Dunham: "Re: Narrowed down bottlneck to disk, how can I find out which FS is being hammered? 100% utilization"
- Next in thread: Darren Dunham: "Re: Narrowed down bottlneck to disk, how can I find out which FS is being hammered? 100% utilization"
- Reply: Darren Dunham: "Re: Narrowed down bottlneck to disk, how can I find out which FS is being hammered? 100% utilization"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: 28 Apr 2004 06:17:10 -0700
Darren Dunham <ddunham@redwood.taos.com> wrote in message news:<66wjc.56908$Em6.22947@newssvr25.news.prodigy.com>...
> Tonij <tonij67@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > In my process of drilling down to get to the bottom of our performance
> > issues, I am seeing huge I/O wait on a particular disk. What tools
> > are available to dig deeper, find out which file system is hammering
> > the disk and/or which processes are hogging the CPUS? We are talking
> > 100% utilization here:
>
> "hogging the CPUs"?
>
> > mpstat output:
>> Your CPUs are nearly idle. You're only averaging around 15-20%
> utilization.
They are at 100% all day long, the format of the mpstat got messed up:
mjf xcal intr ithr csw icsw migr smtx srw syscl usr sys wt idl
0 3283 288 1 5986 318 657 87 0 6553 25 23 52 0
0 4283 3895 3791 5532 256 462 244 0 6398 33 17 50 0
Am I not reading that correctly? The last column "idl" is telling me
the cpus are spending 0% of the time idle, or 100% busy.
>
> I'd look at this page:
> http://www.sun.com/sun-on-net/itworld/UIR961001perf.html
>
Will do.
> It's not identical to your situation, but it shows the technique of
> using 'prex' to find processes that are writing to a disk. If you dump
> the output and write short script to compile a histogram of the
> processes that are doing I/O, you might have a hog show up.
>
> > This system looks like this all day long! Main apps are Oracle and a
> > thirdparty app that I have not yet figured out what it's purpose is (I
> > got thrown into a new environment where the previous sysadmin left,
> > you know the story :)
>
> Probably Oracle. Are you a DBA? Do you have anyone that can see if
> Oracle is performing well or not?
I am not a DBA. The DBAS telle me "things run slow" :/
>
> > I have scripts running to capture sar, vmstat, iostat, mpstat, netstat
> > output and they all point to i/o wait...
>
> Great. That's what databases do. They move data around. If you don't
> have anything else to do, then the CPU will appear in I/O wait. That's
> not necessarily a problem.
Not sure I understand this...if my CPUs are at 100% all day long and
disks are waiting it is not a problem?
TIA,
- Next message: David Magda: "logadm package (Solaris 8)"
- Previous message: James Carlson: "Re: meaning of 1st column of output of "rpcinfo""
- In reply to: Darren Dunham: "Re: Narrowed down bottlneck to disk, how can I find out which FS is being hammered? 100% utilization"
- Next in thread: Darren Dunham: "Re: Narrowed down bottlneck to disk, how can I find out which FS is being hammered? 100% utilization"
- Reply: Darren Dunham: "Re: Narrowed down bottlneck to disk, how can I find out which FS is being hammered? 100% utilization"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|