Re: Actually slower machine works faster
From: Peter Meiser (peter_meiser_at_gmx.de)
Date: 05/07/04
- Next message: Mark Clements: "Re: Memory leak example"
- Previous message: Alan Coopersmith: "Re: Question about version 2 Sun Java Desktop"
- In reply to: Thomas Dehn: "Re: Actually slower machine works faster"
- Next in thread: Jorgen Moquist: "Re: Actually slower machine works faster"
- Reply: Jorgen Moquist: "Re: Actually slower machine works faster"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Fri, 07 May 2004 09:59:07 +0200
Thomas Dehn schrieb:
> Is the compilation local in both cases (both the compilers
> being installed locally, and the file system where the
> code is stored being local)?
Yes. Everything happens local.
> Are you using exactly the same compilers, and the
> same compilation options on both systems?
Same compilers yes, but I use different make.
> Is this real code, or some pet code which takes just
> a few seconds to compile?
I'm compiling the latest rsync Sources.
PM
- Next message: Mark Clements: "Re: Memory leak example"
- Previous message: Alan Coopersmith: "Re: Question about version 2 Sun Java Desktop"
- In reply to: Thomas Dehn: "Re: Actually slower machine works faster"
- Next in thread: Jorgen Moquist: "Re: Actually slower machine works faster"
- Reply: Jorgen Moquist: "Re: Actually slower machine works faster"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|