Solaris vs Linux on SPARC and x86/AMD
From: Hunn E. Balsiche (hunnebal_at_yahoo.com)
Date: 05/13/04
- Previous message: nomail: "Re: Allowing FTP Access"
- Next in thread: Alan Coopersmith: "Re: Solaris vs Linux on SPARC and x86/AMD"
- Reply: Alan Coopersmith: "Re: Solaris vs Linux on SPARC and x86/AMD"
- Reply: CJT: "Re: Solaris vs Linux on SPARC and x86/AMD"
- Reply: Rich Teer: "Re: Solaris vs Linux on SPARC and x86/AMD"
- Reply: slrn: "Re: Solaris vs Linux on SPARC and x86/AMD"
- Reply: Bill Davidsen: "Re: Solaris vs Linux on SPARC and x86/AMD"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Thu, 13 May 2004 13:29:17 -0400
Is there differences between Solaris 9 and Linux 2.6 in term of :
- performance w.r.t database, web, and other server related apps
- compatibility with various hardware
- cost
- expandability
- security
- hardware vendor support, e.g disk storage
- dependability - i've seen Solaris on SPARC running for years
without rebooting
- stability
- recoverability when disaster happen
- interopability with other OS
Is it safe to say that outside SPARC platform, Linux win for all the above?
How about if we install Linux on SPARC as well? Many are comfortable with
single platform architecture such as SPARC from Sun Microsystem or they are
already invested in SPARC hardware.
Regards
- Previous message: nomail: "Re: Allowing FTP Access"
- Next in thread: Alan Coopersmith: "Re: Solaris vs Linux on SPARC and x86/AMD"
- Reply: Alan Coopersmith: "Re: Solaris vs Linux on SPARC and x86/AMD"
- Reply: CJT: "Re: Solaris vs Linux on SPARC and x86/AMD"
- Reply: Rich Teer: "Re: Solaris vs Linux on SPARC and x86/AMD"
- Reply: slrn: "Re: Solaris vs Linux on SPARC and x86/AMD"
- Reply: Bill Davidsen: "Re: Solaris vs Linux on SPARC and x86/AMD"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|