Re: Supplemental Kernel Patch vs. Generic Kernel
From: Alan Hargreaves - Product Technical Support (APAC) (Alan.Hargreaves_at_Sun.COM)
Date: 05/27/04
- Next message: GE: "Best Practice re: patching multiple Sun Servers connected to a Hitachi SAN"
- Previous message: Rybak: "TLI t_snd hangs"
- In reply to: Peter Bunclark: "Re: Supplemental Kernel Patch vs. Generic Kernel"
- Next in thread: Peter Bunclark: "Re: Supplemental Kernel Patch vs. Generic Kernel"
- Reply: Peter Bunclark: "Re: Supplemental Kernel Patch vs. Generic Kernel"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Fri, 28 May 2004 06:16:20 +1000
Peter Bunclark wrote:
> I wish they'd documented that instead of confusing the hell out of us.
The shift to 117000 was noted in Sun Alert 57489 which can be viewed at
http://sunsolve.sun.com/pub-cgi/retrieve.pl?doc=fsalert%2F57489&zone_32=rejuvenated%20kernel%20patch&wholewords=on
> Is it the same
> deal with Solaris 9 112233-12/117171-02 ?
Reading the patch it does seem like it.
I can;t fin a Sun Alert notification for the move to 117350 and 117171
though. I'll chase this up.
alan.
-- Alan Hargreaves Senior Technical Support Specialist/VOSJEC Engineer Product Technical Support (APAC) Sun Microsystems
- Next message: GE: "Best Practice re: patching multiple Sun Servers connected to a Hitachi SAN"
- Previous message: Rybak: "TLI t_snd hangs"
- In reply to: Peter Bunclark: "Re: Supplemental Kernel Patch vs. Generic Kernel"
- Next in thread: Peter Bunclark: "Re: Supplemental Kernel Patch vs. Generic Kernel"
- Reply: Peter Bunclark: "Re: Supplemental Kernel Patch vs. Generic Kernel"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]