Re: Supplemental Kernel Patch vs. Generic Kernel
From: Peter Bunclark (psb_at_ast.cam.ac.uk)
Date: 05/28/04
- Next message: Aashish Manocha: "Re: Strange TCP behaviour"
- Previous message: Tim Smith: "JDBC Connection Refused to 10g on Solaris 8"
- In reply to: Alan Hargreaves - Product Technical Support (APAC): "Re: Supplemental Kernel Patch vs. Generic Kernel"
- Next in thread: Casper H.S. ***: "Re: Supplemental Kernel Patch vs. Generic Kernel"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Fri, 28 May 2004 08:07:23 +0100
Alan Hargreaves - Product Technical Support (APAC) wrote:
> Peter Bunclark wrote:
>
>> I wish they'd documented that instead of confusing the hell out of us.
>
>
> The shift to 117000 was noted in Sun Alert 57489 which can be viewed
> at
> http://sunsolve.sun.com/pub-cgi/retrieve.pl?doc=fsalert%2F57489&zone_32=rejuvenated%20kernel%20patch&wholewords=on
>
>
>> Is it the same
>> deal with Solaris 9 112233-12/117171-02 ?
>
>
> Reading the patch it does seem like it.
>
> I can;t fin a Sun Alert notification for the move to 117350 and 117171
> though. I'll chase this up.
>
> alan.
> --
> Alan Hargreaves
> Senior Technical Support Specialist/VOSJEC Engineer
> Product Technical Support (APAC)
> Sun Microsystems
Please can you ask them to put a reference in the rejuvinated KU README?
Pete.
- Next message: Aashish Manocha: "Re: Strange TCP behaviour"
- Previous message: Tim Smith: "JDBC Connection Refused to 10g on Solaris 8"
- In reply to: Alan Hargreaves - Product Technical Support (APAC): "Re: Supplemental Kernel Patch vs. Generic Kernel"
- Next in thread: Casper H.S. ***: "Re: Supplemental Kernel Patch vs. Generic Kernel"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]