Re: /usr/bin/ls /usr/ucb/ls /usr/local/bin/ls
From: Paul Eggert (eggert_at_twinsun.com)
Date: 07/31/04
- Next message: Gary: "Re: Laserjet printer"
- Previous message: Gary L. Burnore: "Re: Solaris 7, 8, 9 and sendmail+dns"
- In reply to: Alan Coopersmith: "Re: /usr/bin/ls /usr/ucb/ls /usr/local/bin/ls"
- Next in thread: Rich Teer: "Re: /usr/bin/ls /usr/ucb/ls /usr/local/bin/ls"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 18:14:28 -0700
At Fri, 30 Jul 2004 21:55:54 +0000 (UTC), Alan Coopersmith <alanc@alum.calberkeley.org> writes:
> /usr/local/bin/ls does not come with the OS, so it's whatever you've
> installed locally (likely GNU ls).
There are two other 'ls' implementations too, at least in Solaris 9:
/usr/bin/sparcv9/ls -- 64-bit ls
/usr/xpg4/bin/ls -- POSIX-compatible ls
You might want to be using /usr/bin/sparcv9/ls on any modern Sparc
system with a 64-bit OS, as it should handle files with large
timestamps correctly; /usr/bin/ls doesn't. I hope the Opteron-based
systems will also have a 64-bit 'ls', whenever their 64-bit OSes are
released.
Or you could build and install a 64-bit GNU "ls" as /usr/local/bin/ls
(which would be even better :-).
- Next message: Gary: "Re: Laserjet printer"
- Previous message: Gary L. Burnore: "Re: Solaris 7, 8, 9 and sendmail+dns"
- In reply to: Alan Coopersmith: "Re: /usr/bin/ls /usr/ucb/ls /usr/local/bin/ls"
- Next in thread: Rich Teer: "Re: /usr/bin/ls /usr/ucb/ls /usr/local/bin/ls"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|