Re: GPL'ing Solaris won't save SUN
From: Peter Bunclark (psb_at_ast.cam.ac.uk)
Date: 08/27/04
- Next message: Dan Espen: "Re: Anyone else seeing this management trend favoring Linux?"
- Previous message: Joerg Schilling: "Re: Anyone else seeing this management trend favoring Linux?"
- In reply to: Casper H.S. Dik: "Re: GPL'ing Solaris won't save SUN"
- Next in thread: Beardy: "Re: GPL'ing Solaris won't save SUN"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2004 14:03:47 +0100
Casper H.S. Dik wrote:
>Christopher Browne <cbbrowne@acm.org> writes:
>
>
>
>>Kernel panics resulting from memory getting scribbled on
>>inappropriately have been the "canonical" problem. The memory has
>>been replaced, repetitively. CPUs and carriers have been replaced, ad
>>nauseum.
>>
>>
>
>Memory getting scribbled over looks more like a software
>problem than a hardware problem. (Somewhat dependign on
>the pattern)
>
>It's certainly not a usual problem (what OS version was it
>running, what additional software, specficially kernel components,
>and was it ever run with "set kmem_flags = 0xf")
>
>It pains me to see unhappy customers; and you story is particularly
>uncharacteristic as far as I can tell.
>
>Casper
>
>
There have been many anecdotes over time, including at least one from me,
of Sparc/Solaris systems running longer than a year; and usually the final
reboot is caused by a must-have security patch or a power cut. (And
`running'
means running services, not just idling away in a corner).
Pete.
- Next message: Dan Espen: "Re: Anyone else seeing this management trend favoring Linux?"
- Previous message: Joerg Schilling: "Re: Anyone else seeing this management trend favoring Linux?"
- In reply to: Casper H.S. Dik: "Re: GPL'ing Solaris won't save SUN"
- Next in thread: Beardy: "Re: GPL'ing Solaris won't save SUN"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|