Re: SPAM Filter
From: UNIX admin (tripivceta_at_hotmail.com)
Date: 09/06/04
- Next message: Levente KOVACS: "Re: Find and replace"
- Previous message: Thomas Glanzmann: "Re: Find and replace"
- In reply to: Dave Uhring: "Re: SPAM Filter"
- Next in thread: Dave Uhring: "Re: SPAM Filter"
- Reply: Dave Uhring: "Re: SPAM Filter"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Mon, 6 Sep 2004 11:41:03 +0200
"Dave Uhring" <daveuhring@yahoo.com> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
news:pan.2004.09.06.06.13.02.478820@yahoo.com...
> We are discussing the filtration of spam at ISP level, not on one's own
> personal mail server. Even 0.1% false positives in your recommended
> filter is unacceptable. And I am damn sure that I will not sieve through
> over 6000 filtered messages per day to determine which were false
> positives.
Why would you need to do that? With solutions like DSPAM, that's up to
users to decide. They teach the filter what *is* and *is not* spam *to
them*, and the computer does the rest of the work. An admin is involved only
so much as it takes to install and configure the resource. There should be
minimal or no babysitting and hand holding involved.
> Blackhole listing will not remove the spam problem entirely and had you
> paid attention to my first comment you would have seen that I claimed only
> 90% or more rejection of spam. I can, if you wish, document that from the
> maillog on the server.
No, I believe you. I know how it works; I've used it. You're saying it
filters "90% or more", but a Bayesian filtering solution is ~97% accurate at
the very start, and with a decent sample, it gets to be ~99.99975% accurate,
which seems to be below your required 0.1%. And because it is the user who
decides what is spam, no e-mails are lost by the ISP. But don't let me talk
you into it though; you have Google.
- Next message: Levente KOVACS: "Re: Find and replace"
- Previous message: Thomas Glanzmann: "Re: Find and replace"
- In reply to: Dave Uhring: "Re: SPAM Filter"
- Next in thread: Dave Uhring: "Re: SPAM Filter"
- Reply: Dave Uhring: "Re: SPAM Filter"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|