Re: SPAM Filter

From: UNIX admin (tripivceta_at_hotmail.com)
Date: 09/06/04


Date: Mon, 6 Sep 2004 11:41:03 +0200


"Dave Uhring" <daveuhring@yahoo.com> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
news:pan.2004.09.06.06.13.02.478820@yahoo.com...
> We are discussing the filtration of spam at ISP level, not on one's own
> personal mail server. Even 0.1% false positives in your recommended
> filter is unacceptable. And I am damn sure that I will not sieve through
> over 6000 filtered messages per day to determine which were false
> positives.

Why would you need to do that? With solutions like DSPAM, that's up to
users to decide. They teach the filter what *is* and *is not* spam *to
them*, and the computer does the rest of the work. An admin is involved only
so much as it takes to install and configure the resource. There should be
minimal or no babysitting and hand holding involved.

> Blackhole listing will not remove the spam problem entirely and had you
> paid attention to my first comment you would have seen that I claimed only
> 90% or more rejection of spam. I can, if you wish, document that from the
> maillog on the server.

No, I believe you. I know how it works; I've used it. You're saying it
filters "90% or more", but a Bayesian filtering solution is ~97% accurate at
the very start, and with a decent sample, it gets to be ~99.99975% accurate,
which seems to be below your required 0.1%. And because it is the user who
decides what is spam, no e-mails are lost by the ISP. But don't let me talk
you into it though; you have Google.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Why cant ISPs stop spam/virus ?!
    ... I don't doubt that a small load of well designed spam can pass through. ... You need to get a decent ISP. ... The method of distribution is now thousands of Windows computers, ... You cannot filter by place of origin. ...
    (comp.os.linux.misc)
  • RE: Bystander shot by a spam filter.
    ... Bystander shot by a spam filter. ... bad advice is being mass marketed through the good offices of FreeBSD, ... Spambouncer doesn't like Inflow. ...
    (FreeBSD-Security)
  • Re: Look at these update from M$ Corporation.
    ... a mass scale which results in the complete breakdown of communication without ... few samples for the filters to learn that this is spam and that is not. ... because you're posting tripe to mailing lists with a needless Reply-To set ... samples of what I don't want and feeding them to the filter when the show up. ...
    (Debian-User)
  • Re: OT: writing resumes with VT100 for a Lisp job
    ... The more spam a user gets, the less likely he'll be to notice one ... There's a very simple way any spammer can defeat such a filter: ... it would not be enough for spammers to make ... Bubby We Need Your PERMISSI0N ...
    (comp.lang.lisp)
  • Re: porn email
    ... A good proxy spam filter should add a tag ... If the "Subject:" tag is [spam], then you can create a single ... > delete folder. ... Spammers know that people try to block their ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.inetexplorer.ie6_outlookexpress)