Re: Sybase on UltraSPARC IV
From: Casper H.S. Dik (Casper.Dik_at_Sun.COM)
Date: 09/29/04
- Next message: Casper H.S. ***: "Re: CERT and IPSEC and SSH"
- Previous message: Paul Hallam: "How do I talk decnet from Solaris to Decnet OSI & DECNET Phase 4"
- In reply to:(deleted message) Anthony Mandic: "Re: Sybase on UltraSPARC IV"
- Next in thread: noone: "Re: Sybase on UltraSPARC IV"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: 29 Sep 2004 09:03:48 GMT
>Per Eirik wrote:
>> I think CMT is comparable to Hyperthreading on Intel XEON CPUs. Sybase
>> recommends that Hyperthreading should be turned off to maximize Sybase
>> performance on Linux, see page 3:
>>
>> http://www.sybase.com/content/1025313/linux_optimizing_performance_wp.pdf
>>
>> Would that also be the case for UltraSPARC IV processors?
No, Hyperthreading and UltraSPARC IV CMT are not the same thing; the
UltraSPARC IV is two CPUs on a single die with some cache bits shared.
The performance is comparable to two independent CPUs.
Hyperthreading shares most of the CPU real estate; the maximum performance
gain is a few percentage points and a for certain workloads there's
a performance loss.
Casper
-- Expressed in this posting are my opinions. They are in no way related to opinions held by my employer, Sun Microsystems. Statements on Sun products included here are not gospel and may be fiction rather than truth.
- Next message: Casper H.S. ***: "Re: CERT and IPSEC and SSH"
- Previous message: Paul Hallam: "How do I talk decnet from Solaris to Decnet OSI & DECNET Phase 4"
- In reply to:(deleted message) Anthony Mandic: "Re: Sybase on UltraSPARC IV"
- Next in thread: noone: "Re: Sybase on UltraSPARC IV"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]