Re: "Torn between two OS" - Solaris vs Linux
From: Paul Floyd (root_at_127.0.0.1)
Date: 12/21/04
- Next message: John D Groenveld: "Re: MEDIA: Torvalds: A Solaris skeptic"
- Previous message: Eric Boutilier: "Cataloguing Solaris groups"
- In reply to: natG: "Re: "Torn between two OS" - Solaris vs Linux"
- Next in thread: Drazen Kacar: "Re: "Torn between two OS" - Solaris vs Linux"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: 21 Dec 2004 21:12:30 GMT
On Mon, 20 Dec 2004 19:13:48 GMT, natG
<natgrossDOTrentalsystems@verizon.net> wrote:
>
> Samba negates the need for nfs, even amongst Linux systems,
> although its primary design was for Windows<>Linux.
Except that CIFS is slow. I prefer to install NFS on Windows than CIFS
on Unix.
A bientot
Paul
-- Paul Floyd http://paulf.free.fr (for what it's worth) Surgery: ennobled Gerald.
- Next message: John D Groenveld: "Re: MEDIA: Torvalds: A Solaris skeptic"
- Previous message: Eric Boutilier: "Cataloguing Solaris groups"
- In reply to: natG: "Re: "Torn between two OS" - Solaris vs Linux"
- Next in thread: Drazen Kacar: "Re: "Torn between two OS" - Solaris vs Linux"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
