Re: ipsec internal
From: Dan McDonald (danmcd_at_Eng.Sun.COM)
Date: 12/22/04
- Next message: Hamilcar Barca: "Re: Linux Advocates Fear Solaris 10."
- Previous message: Rich Pierson: "Re: Juggling a file system quandry"
- In reply to: matthias_at_blankenhaus.com: "Re: ipsec internal"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2004 02:54:34 +0000 (UTC)
In article <1103676410.195191.185370@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com>,
<matthias@blankenhaus.com> wrote:
>Hi Dan !
Hello.
>So bottom line the streams stack looks like this, right ?
>
>TCP
>AUTH_MD5
>IPSECAH (e.g.)
>IP
No.
It's more like (and make sure you're monospaced for this... ;):
AUTH_MD5
TCP IPSECAH
IP <---side-shuffles to----> IP
For example. In S9, there are stacks like the one on the right for every
algorithm. A better way to visualize it would be an inverse tree-like
structure, with IP at the bottom, and a choice of AH, ESP, TCP, UDP, and
above AH or ESP choices of ciphers or hashes. (An x-kernel protocol graph,
kinda, for anyone who played with the x-kernel.)
It's not clear what you're looking for - the data? Or the post-IPsec-munged
whole packet?
>.. because then I still would not get the decrypted data, or why not ?
Yep, you won't get the decrypted data by merely opening an IP stream.
>> You're not going to easily do what you wish. You may wish to try a
>version
>> of Ethereal that consults the SADB and decrypts/authenticates the
>sniffed
>> copy of the packet.
>Could you please elaborate a bit on this one ?
Ethereal is a packet-sniffer (user-land). If you're on the machine that has
the IPsec keying material, you can process the encrypted packet inside an
extension to Ethereal (it _may_ already have the capacity to do this).
-- Daniel L. McDonald - Solaris Networking & Security Engineering Mail: danmcd@east.sun.com | * MY OPINIONS ARE NOT NECESSARILY SUN'S! * 1 Network Drive Burlington, MA |"rising falling at force ten http://blogs.sun.com/danmcd/ | we twist the world and ride the wind" - Rush
- Next message: Hamilcar Barca: "Re: Linux Advocates Fear Solaris 10."
- Previous message: Rich Pierson: "Re: Juggling a file system quandry"
- In reply to: matthias_at_blankenhaus.com: "Re: ipsec internal"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]