Re: Studio 10 compilers for Solaris released
From: Seongbae Park (Seongbae.Park_at_Sun.COM)
Date: 02/01/05
- Next message: Michael Tosch: "Re: patch issues"
- Previous message: Darren Dunham: "Array full of dead drives."
- In reply to: Dan Koren: "Re: Studio 10 compilers for Solaris released"
- Next in thread: Dan Koren: "Re: Studio 10 compilers for Solaris released"
- Reply: Dan Koren: "Re: Studio 10 compilers for Solaris released"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2005 17:52:08 +0000 (UTC)
Dan Koren <dankoren@yahoo.com> wrote:
> An undeniable part of that reality
> is that Intel's market share is still a lot
> bigger than AMD's or Sun's.
Indeed.
> As I said earlier, the only measure of success
> is success.
Yes.
BTW, according to google,
your last posting to comp.unix.solaris was sometimes around early 1995.
I wonder what made you more interested in this "sinking ship".
Unless it's just a mere intellectual curiosity,
it looks to me that the recent moves by Sun made you more interested
in Sun and Solaris
(probably not in SPARC yet, although I'm sure
you'll be a lot more interested when we ship Niagara).
Anyway, welcome back to comp.unix.solaris.
-- #pragma ident "Seongbae Park, compiler, http://blogs.sun.com/seongbae/"
- Next message: Michael Tosch: "Re: patch issues"
- Previous message: Darren Dunham: "Array full of dead drives."
- In reply to: Dan Koren: "Re: Studio 10 compilers for Solaris released"
- Next in thread: Dan Koren: "Re: Studio 10 compilers for Solaris released"
- Reply: Dan Koren: "Re: Studio 10 compilers for Solaris released"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|