Re: SCNA Solaris 10
From: Scott Howard (scott_at_hunterlink.net.au)
Date: 04/02/05
- Next message: barts_at_smaalders.net: "Re: nscd strategy files/nis and configuration file"
- Previous message: Scott Howard: "Re: Solaris 10 and 8 or more metadbs cause metadb loss"
- In reply to: |a|i|e|i|e|: "SCNA Solaris 10"
- Next in thread: Scott Howard: "Re: SCNA Solaris 10"
- Reply: Scott Howard: "Re: SCNA Solaris 10"
- Reply: ReD-MaN: "Re: SCNA Solaris 10"
- Reply: Ceri Davies: "Re: SCNA Solaris 10"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: 2 Apr 2005 03:06:16 GMT
|a|i|e|i|e| <aieie@aieie.com> wrote:
> I ended this exam few hours ago...
No, you ended the BETA version of this exam...
> I don't know about my score, and i don't know the minimun score for pass
At this stage there is no minimum score for a pass - that will be decided
once the beta is over (that's one of the purposes of the beta exams) and
if you got above that mark in the beta then you will pass.
> It was quite hard
Thanks, we tried hard to make it so :)
This is the hardest of the Sol10 certification exams, and by far the
hardest. The plan was to make it such that you wouldn't pass if you didn't
actually know the material and hadn't played with (most of) it - after all,
that's the point of certification!
> and TOO long..
The beta exams are much longer than the real exams. The real exams will
get a randomised, smaller subset of questions. What you got was a subset
of the full list, but a much larger subset than normal.
Scott
- Next message: barts_at_smaalders.net: "Re: nscd strategy files/nis and configuration file"
- Previous message: Scott Howard: "Re: Solaris 10 and 8 or more metadbs cause metadb loss"
- In reply to: |a|i|e|i|e|: "SCNA Solaris 10"
- Next in thread: Scott Howard: "Re: SCNA Solaris 10"
- Reply: Scott Howard: "Re: SCNA Solaris 10"
- Reply: ReD-MaN: "Re: SCNA Solaris 10"
- Reply: Ceri Davies: "Re: SCNA Solaris 10"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
