Re: Zones/Containers and routing
From: Lion-O (nosp_at_m.catslair.org)
Date: 05/19/05
- Next message: Richard B. Gilbert: "Re: Ultra 10 & 2nd EIDE drive"
- Previous message: Tony Lawrence: "Re: Solaris 10 Success Story."
- In reply to: Darren Dunham: "Re: Zones/Containers and routing"
- Next in thread: Darren Dunham: "Re: Zones/Containers and routing"
- Reply: Darren Dunham: "Re: Zones/Containers and routing"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Thu, 19 May 2005 00:06:10 -0000
> Of course my question is why would you want to use a private network
> space if you want to communicate with other hosts? Why not just
> create them on 147?
>
> In other words, what is the purpose of the private network space in
> this case if you're not trying to "hide" the interfaces?
I think I know what he's intention is since I'm looking for a solution
for my situation in the same direction; one IP which serves some daemons
(mta, httpd, bind, etc.) which are running in a non-global zone, thus
shielded from the rest. The main zone only transfers the data to and
from.
Easily done with ipnat.
-- Groetjes, Peter .\\ PGP/GPG key: http://www.catslair.org/pubkey.asc
- Next message: Richard B. Gilbert: "Re: Ultra 10 & 2nd EIDE drive"
- Previous message: Tony Lawrence: "Re: Solaris 10 Success Story."
- In reply to: Darren Dunham: "Re: Zones/Containers and routing"
- Next in thread: Darren Dunham: "Re: Zones/Containers and routing"
- Reply: Darren Dunham: "Re: Zones/Containers and routing"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|