Re: Rackmount Sun Hardware
From: Dan Foster (usenet_at_evilphb.org)
Date: 08/30/05
- Next message: mark_at_uunix.com: "Re: Network Start up"
- Previous message: gerryt_at_vcn.bc.ca: "Re: Cluster with two Fire 280R to install Oracle"
- In reply to: BN: "Re: Rackmount Sun Hardware"
- Next in thread: Frank Cusack: "Re: Rackmount Sun Hardware"
- Reply: Frank Cusack: "Re: Rackmount Sun Hardware"
- Reply: Bernd Haug: "Re: Rackmount Sun Hardware"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2005 14:40:51 -0500
In article <11h9cqo7fpjvm6a@news.supernews.com>, BN <BN@BN.COMO> wrote:
>>
>> Why not SW RAID? Unless you're talking about RAID 5, SW RAID isn't
>> that bad...
>
> Software raid is too unreliable. You have to use a flooopy to boot up
> if the SECONDARY (non-boot)drive in a IDE or SCSI chain (mirrored
> setup) goes bad.
Not with Solaris 10 on the V20Z.
Tested, and didn't need a floppy to boot off the opposite mirror half
when either half had "gone bad".
-Dan
- Next message: mark_at_uunix.com: "Re: Network Start up"
- Previous message: gerryt_at_vcn.bc.ca: "Re: Cluster with two Fire 280R to install Oracle"
- In reply to: BN: "Re: Rackmount Sun Hardware"
- Next in thread: Frank Cusack: "Re: Rackmount Sun Hardware"
- Reply: Frank Cusack: "Re: Rackmount Sun Hardware"
- Reply: Bernd Haug: "Re: Rackmount Sun Hardware"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|