Re: Weird routing problem
From: Paul Hirst (paul-hirst_at_ntlworld.com)
Date: 10/27/05
- Next message: Darren Dunham: "Re: SCSI Disk and FAT32"
- Previous message: Alan Coopersmith: "Re: WARNING: AMD64 Daylight saving time issue."
- In reply to: Lion-O: "Re: Weird routing problem"
- Next in thread: lee-dont_at_web-spam-a-me-roonie.net: "Re: Weird routing problem"
- Reply: lee-dont_at_web-spam-a-me-roonie.net: "Re: Weird routing problem"
- Reply: chocolatemalt: "Re: Weird routing problem"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2005 15:51:53 GMT
"Lion-O" <nosp@m.catslair.org> wrote in message
news:slrndlvtsr.525.nosp@linux.intranet.lan...
> > I had to reboot the machine and for some reason it lost the ability to
> > route, I checked the contents of the /etc/defaultrouter,
> > /etc/resolv.conf & nsswitch.conf but no joy traceroute showed the
> > following :-
>
> I don't think it lost the ability but that the receiving end never
> bothered to pick up the packets.
>
> > 10.0.0.0 10.0.0.10 U 1 7 eri0
> > 224.0.0.0 10.0.0.10 U 1 0 eri0
> > default 10.0.0.1 UG 1 9
> > 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 UH 4 91 lo0
>
> So I take it your box is 10.0.0.10 on eri0. I trust its a static IP
> adress and not a DHCP issue ?
>
> Well, the only thing which looks strange to me is that your routing
> table doesn't specify the nic which should utilize the default routed
> packets. For example, on my server:
>
> magi:/home/peter $ netstat -rn | grep default
> default 82.161.21.1 UG 1 141 rtls2
>
>
> Now, it could be a minor detail but because I also read many stories
> about Solaris being able to maintain multiple default routing points its
> my current guess that this is mandatory.
>
> > now the wierd bit, left the machine for an hour or so and DNS is now
> > working and it's routing to 10.0.0.1 as it should do! does anyone have
> > any ideas as to what's going on here
>
> My very uneducated guess; productive self healing at work. Or, in other
> words, after a moment it did some arp requests on the nic, detected the
> 82.161.21.1 and from that point on resumed communication.
>
> However, I've read some about PSH and also read/seen some of its
> features but far from enough for me to come up with a positive answer on
> this. Still, this is the area I'd look.
>
> --
> Groetjes, Peter
>
> .\\ PGP/GPG key: http://www.catslair.org/pubkey.asc
Hmmm, the plot thickens I've got eri0 showing against the default router now
And still no joy, I did notice that ifconfig showed ROUTER which I removed
and
Still nothin, but after about 30 minutes or so everything starts working the
DNS
, routing the works
Any ideas ?
Thanks
Paul
- Next message: Darren Dunham: "Re: SCSI Disk and FAT32"
- Previous message: Alan Coopersmith: "Re: WARNING: AMD64 Daylight saving time issue."
- In reply to: Lion-O: "Re: Weird routing problem"
- Next in thread: lee-dont_at_web-spam-a-me-roonie.net: "Re: Weird routing problem"
- Reply: lee-dont_at_web-spam-a-me-roonie.net: "Re: Weird routing problem"
- Reply: chocolatemalt: "Re: Weird routing problem"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|