Re: NFS timeouts (Solaris 9 and Solaris 10)
From: Sami Ketola (Sami.Ketola_at_iki.finland.invalid)
Date: 11/10/05
- Next message: Dave Uhring: "Re: Problems with localhost"
- Previous message: Sami Ketola: "Re: Solaris 10 x86 : is my network card detected?"
- In reply to: Carsten Benecke: "Re: NFS timeouts (Solaris 9 and Solaris 10)"
- Next in thread: Carsten Benecke: "Re: NFS timeouts (Solaris 9 and Solaris 10)"
- Reply: Carsten Benecke: "Re: NFS timeouts (Solaris 9 and Solaris 10)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2005 20:38:38 -0000
Carsten Benecke <Carsten.Benecke@rrz.uni-hamburg.de> wrote:
> Hmm,
>
> you are right, proto=tcp had been ignored, but -o proto=tcp,vers=3 does
> not make a difference. I still run into timeouts.
>
> On the other hand, -o proto=udp,vers3 now succeeds on both Sol 9 an Sol
> 10...
>
> So maybe tcp-transport is the default; but it should work with either
> tcp or udp, shouldn't it?
Yes. It's supposed to work with both tcp and udp. Without more data it's still
impossible to say if it's a problem with the server or the client.
please try snooping network traffic while doing ls to get more idea
where it goes wrong.
Sami
-- .signature: no such file or directory
- Next message: Dave Uhring: "Re: Problems with localhost"
- Previous message: Sami Ketola: "Re: Solaris 10 x86 : is my network card detected?"
- In reply to: Carsten Benecke: "Re: NFS timeouts (Solaris 9 and Solaris 10)"
- Next in thread: Carsten Benecke: "Re: NFS timeouts (Solaris 9 and Solaris 10)"
- Reply: Carsten Benecke: "Re: NFS timeouts (Solaris 9 and Solaris 10)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|