Re: Apple should buy SUN.
From: KJ (here_at_there.net)
Date: 11/23/05
- Next message: Logan Shaw: "Re: Apple should buy SUN."
- Previous message: Rich Teer: "Re: Apple should buy SUN."
- In reply to: Tim Smith: "Re: Apple should buy SUN."
- Next in thread: Tim Smith: "Re: Apple should buy SUN."
- Reply: Tim Smith: "Re: Apple should buy SUN."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2005 22:40:54 GMT
Tim Smith wrote:
> In article <PI%gf.31194$1l6.5311@tornado.tampabay.rr.com>, KJ wrote:
>> This is now a completely dated statement. Sun has introduced faster AND
>> cheaper systems than Dell that are certified to run Unix, Linux, and
>> Windows. You'll have to pay more for a slower, less efficient, Dell
>> that offers less flexibility of software choices as compared to a new Sun.
>
> The cheapest server I see at Sun is $745. Dells statr much lower than that.
>
>
Thank you Tim for demonstrating why Dell's business model works.
- Next message: Logan Shaw: "Re: Apple should buy SUN."
- Previous message: Rich Teer: "Re: Apple should buy SUN."
- In reply to: Tim Smith: "Re: Apple should buy SUN."
- Next in thread: Tim Smith: "Re: Apple should buy SUN."
- Reply: Tim Smith: "Re: Apple should buy SUN."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|