Re: Why both Apache v1.3 and v2 in Solaris 10?
<te@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Just installed a fresh copy of Solaris 10 01/06 build with all
> packages+OEM and I noticed it installed both Apache v1.3 and v2.0.
>
> Just curious why they didn't just standardize on one with the initial
> install and then offer the other as part of the Companion CD, etc...
Apache 1.3 is the default. The Apache 2 on Solaris 10
is by default disabled. Why would anybody want to have
to add packages from a CD when
# svcadm enable apache2
is so much easier?
Thomas
.
Relevant Pages
- Re: [PHP] Question before upgrading to 5
... anyway I see you did do a dual apache setup, cool, and got it working properly. ... but it sure is a cool trick if you really need to run php4 sites and php5 sites on one production ... install of apache would allow you to do. ... php in so far as you can also specify a custom prefix to have ...
(php.general) - Re: PHP Tutorials
... >> In this tutorial we assume that your server has activated support for PHP ... install a web server locally (not just Apache). ...
(comp.lang.php) - Re: Two newbie questions
... Apache to install OK but when I then tried to install PHP ... The packages mean it generally takes less skill and effort to install - ...
(comp.lang.php) - Re: Upgrade Fedora Core 3 to Fedora Core 5 Help please
... I run from apache for my family website. ... some of the nice new features that I hear about with Fedora Core 5. ... don't work anymore would be a real problem. ... Format and install fresh would be a real nice way to go and I ...
(comp.os.linux) - Need Help with Adding mod_ssl to Apache
... Solaris 9 system and I am using the relevant version of mod_ssl. ... rather than to install the web server from another source. ... Well, first of all, why are you using the Sun Freeware apache? ...
(comp.unix.solaris) |
|
