Re: Solaris 8 nss_ldap frustration
- From: Chris Ridd <chrisridd@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 07 Feb 2006 09:23:22 +0000
On 6/2/06 10:42, in article slrndufk6e.233.kno@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Matt
Dunford" <kno@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
* Chris Ridd <chrisridd@xxxxxxx>:
On 6/2/06 3:30, in article 43e76b58$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Gary Tay Teng
Teck" <garyttt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
If you apply latest LDAPv2 patch 108993 (back ported patch of Solaris9
ldap client), Solaris8 LDAP client should behave the same as Solaris9
for instance it could use version 2 syntax of ldap_client_file and etc...
Thanks for the clue. Although showrev suggested 108993-49 was installed,
attempting to reinstall that patch failed because of missing dependant
packages (ppp etc) So perhaps it wasn't installed properly? I reapplied the
patch using patchadd -u...
But ldapclient *still* didn't take the same args as Solaris 9's. Grr. So I
stole the ldap_client_file from a working Solaris 9 box and that seems to
have done the trick!
Have you tried a profile?
ldapclient -P profilename 192.168.20.10
The profile I use works across my solaris 8, 9, & 10
boxes. Plus, when you make a change to the profile, it
will propogate across your network.
What schema is required for this profile, and how does ldapclient locate the
profile entry just given the address of the server?
Cheers,
Chris
.
- References:
- Solaris 8 nss_ldap frustration
- From: Chris Ridd
- Re: Solaris 8 nss_ldap frustration
- From: Gary Tay Teng Teck
- Re: Solaris 8 nss_ldap frustration
- From: Chris Ridd
- Re: Solaris 8 nss_ldap frustration
- From: Matt Dunford
- Solaris 8 nss_ldap frustration
- Prev by Date: script with counter
- Next by Date: Re: Binary File Differences: When Do Differences Matter?
- Previous by thread: Re: Solaris 8 nss_ldap frustration
- Next by thread: Re: Solaris 8 nss_ldap frustration
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|