Re: Solaris vs AIX
- From: "Bob Jones" <email@xxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 00:20:40 GMT
"Cydrome Leader" <presence@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:ea461i$915$3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Bob Jones <email@xxxxxx> wrote:
"Rich Teer" <rich.teer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:Pine.SOL.4.64.0607232147430.27567@xxxxxxxxxxxx
On Mon, 24 Jul 2006, Alexander J. Maidak wrote:
I can't really think of any features that Solaris has that AIX doesn't.
DTrace and ZFS for starters.
Plus Solaris can run on x86 systems. How is that for low cost training?
It
is the best OS for Java and networking applications. There are much more
java is hardly the best for anything other than NOC techs who have to
reboot stuff at night and RAM manufacturers.
Hmmm, I wonder why it is running everywhere including AIX and mainframe.
x86 support is nice. There's no other way I'd run out and get a sun built
server though.
That's why Solaris give you more options. If I don't want to get IBM built
server for AIX, do I have a choice?
applications available on Solaris than AIX. CPUs with different speeds
can
run in the same box, and how about the ability to run 32 threads in a
single
IBM had that first, not even counting the purchase of Sequent.
Had what first?
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Solaris vs AIX
- From: Cydrome Leader
- Re: Solaris vs AIX
- References:
- Solaris vs AIX
- From: racman
- Re: Solaris vs AIX
- From: Alexander J. Maidak
- Re: Solaris vs AIX
- From: Bob Jones
- Re: Solaris vs AIX
- From: Alexander J. Maidak
- Re: Solaris vs AIX
- From: Rich Teer
- Re: Solaris vs AIX
- From: Bob Jones
- Re: Solaris vs AIX
- From: Cydrome Leader
- Solaris vs AIX
- Prev by Date: Re: Problem - Enabling Second Ethernet Interface Affects First
- Next by Date: Re: Weird programming problem...
- Previous by thread: Re: Solaris vs AIX
- Next by thread: Re: Solaris vs AIX
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|