Re: hostname standard
- From: Miroslav Zubcic <news@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2006 23:29:21 +0200
toby wrote:
Up to 24 only is recommended by Solaris doc (based on RFC 952?):
http://docs.sun.com/app/docs/doc/816-5174/6mbb98ug7?a=view
RFC 952 is upgraded by RFC 1123:
2.1 Host Names and Numbers
The syntax of a legal Internet host name was specified in RFC-952
[DNS:4]. One aspect of host name syntax is hereby changed: the
restriction on the first character is relaxed to allow either a
letter or a digit. Host software MUST support this more liberal
syntax.
Even text from docs.sun.com link you posted states on the end this:
"RFC 952 has been modified by RFC 1123 to relax the restriction on the
first character being a digit."
And ... please, strip off non-needed quoted text and signatures when
replying. It helps to make USENet posts much more readable for people.
Thank you.
--
Man is something that shall be overcome.
-- Friedrich Nietzsche
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: hostname standard
- From: toby
- Re: hostname standard
- References:
- hostname standard
- From: WG
- Re: hostname standard
- From: Richard B. Gilbert
- Re: hostname standard
- From: Miroslav Zubcic
- Re: hostname standard
- From: toby
- hostname standard
- Prev by Date: Re: zones and cws pkgs
- Next by Date: Re: zones and cws pkgs
- Previous by thread: Re: hostname standard
- Next by thread: Re: hostname standard
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|