Re: vi ? :))



"TheKingOfSeljuk" <sultanofseljuk@xxxxxxxxx> writes:


I just installed them and didn't like. Gedit is x-window editor and
xemacs is another trouble source and made my tension up. There is no
file/new, close, quit, save save as and similiar menus on program... I
can not understand why people develop so useless programs.

"Menus"? We don't need no stinkin menus ;-)

I started using emacs on a Dec-20 in 1981, and I felt vi was pretty
useless when I used it the first time. Boy, that's more than 25 years
ago :-|

For small edits I use vi, as it is always available. When I do larger
hacks I use xemacs.


I am just looking for a text editor which is like edit.com (DOS) . It
mustn't be so hard

Can't comment on that as I don't use DOS.
.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: vi ? :))
    ... xemacs is another trouble source and made my tension up. ...
    (comp.unix.solaris)
  • Re: vi ? :))
    ... xemacs is another trouble source and made my tension up. ... file/new, close, quit, save save as and similiar menus on program... ... can not understand why people develop so useless programs. ... I wouldn't be to hard for M$ to include vi as it's free code ...
    (comp.unix.solaris)
  • Re: vi ? :))
    ... xemacs is another trouble source and made my tension up. ... file/new, close, quit, save save as and similiar menus on program... ... can not understand why people develop so useless programs. ... I wouldn't be to hard for M$ to include vi as it's free code since long. ...
    (comp.unix.solaris)