Re: Is Solaris 10 a good home os?
- From: abuse@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sun, 08 Apr 2007 18:04:25 GMT
On 2007-04-08, Miroslav Zubcic <news@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
abuse@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
Half (most?) applications you have on suse are not on Solaris
DVD. Some may be found on sunfreeware, a few may be compiled
from source.
*Most* can be compiled from source and even packaged as SYSV packages if
you are pedantic. :-)
Of course, you must set up proper CC, CFLAGS, LD_OPTIONS, CPPFLAGS, you
must know some tricks like -Du_intXX_t=uintXX_t etc ...
Come back to me when you build the current version of Cyrus-IMAP
(for example) with -xtarget=opteron -xarch=amd64 (or is the other
way around). Pkgmk/pkgtrans is optional, that I can do myself.
And don't ever run "hostname -s" or "killall foo" as root.
Why not? He can learn something in that way. :-)
Speaking of which, I distinctly remember killall ignoring its
argument(s). It appears, that isn't the case anymore -- anyone
knows when that changed? Or was it some other Unix? Just curious.
Dima
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Is Solaris 10 a good home os?
- From: Miroslav Zubcic
- Re: Is Solaris 10 a good home os?
- References:
- Is Solaris 10 a good home os?
- From: toedipper
- Re: Is Solaris 10 a good home os?
- From: abuse
- Re: Is Solaris 10 a good home os?
- From: Miroslav Zubcic
- Is Solaris 10 a good home os?
- Prev by Date: Re: Slow file transfers on network
- Next by Date: jumpstart question
- Previous by thread: Re: Is Solaris 10 a good home os?
- Next by thread: Re: Is Solaris 10 a good home os?
- Index(es):