Re: Solaris 10 NFS server troubles.

Stuart <bigdakine@xxxxxxx> writes:

On Mar 27, 7:26 am, Oscar del Rio <del...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Dave Uhring wrote:
On Thu, 27 Mar 2008 02:37:58 -0700, Stuart wrote:
On Mar 26, 11:30 pm, Stuart <bigdak...@xxxxxxx> wrote:

I'm having a tough time getting a U60 running Solaris 10 to fork
over the goods. I'm running
DNS, but other than that nothing fancy; no LDAP, NIS+ etc.
The other computers are running Solaris 9 and 8.

You might want to edit /etc/default/nfs on the server:

# Sets the maximum version of the NFS protocol that will be registered
# and offered by the server. The default is 4.
NFS_SERVER_VERSMAX=3

That should not make any difference since Solaris 8/9 do not have NFS4.
The problem might be in the dfstab and/or hostname resolution (FQDN?)

No, in fact this system is a DNS slave. No problem with name
resolution.

if the client is not in /etc/hosts You must enter the client FQDN in
/etc/dfs/dfstab.
--
11. Gebot: Wenn Du eine Fahrradklingel hörst, dreh Dich um, reiße
Mund, Nase und Augen auf, trete aber keinesfalls zur Seite.
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Solaris 10 NFS server troubles.
    ... DNS, but other than that nothing fancy; ... The other computers are running Solaris 9 and 8. ... The problem might be in the dfstab and/or hostname resolution ...
    (comp.unix.solaris)
  • Re: Solaris 10 NFS server troubles.
    ... DNS, but other than that nothing fancy; no LDAP, NIS+ etc. ... The other computers are running Solaris 9 and 8. ... But the server is Solaris 10 and it's trying to serve a protocol the ...
    (comp.unix.solaris)
  • Re: Solaris 10 NFS server troubles.
    ... DNS, but other than that nothing fancy; no LDAP, NIS+ etc. ... The other computers are running Solaris 9 and 8. ...
    (comp.unix.solaris)
  • Re: Solaris 10 NFS server troubles.
    ... DNS, but other than that nothing fancy; no LDAP, NIS+ etc. ... The other computers are running Solaris 9 and 8. ...
    (comp.unix.solaris)