Re: lu dsik layout
- From: ddunham@xxxxxxxx (Darren Dunham)
- Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2008 17:20:53 GMT
Tim Bradshaw <tfb+google@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
Sun, I think,
recommend /var in root which I think is somewhat naive to put it
mildly (http://www.tfeb.org/notes/index.html#%5B%5BWhy%20separate
%20%2Fvar%20is%20a%20good%20idea%5D%5D)
I don't disagree with the arguments, but I don't think they're overly
compelling either. I've been running production machines with combo
root/var since 2.6 days. I can't recall any case where the full
filesystem was associated with corruption or further issues.
Hooray when ZFS boot becomes common and the trade-off here shifts more
to splitting it out.
--
Darren Dunham ddunham@xxxxxxxx
Senior Technical Consultant TAOS http://www.taos.com/
Got some Dr Pepper? San Francisco, CA bay area
< This line left intentionally blank to confuse you. >
.
- References:
- lu dsik layout
- From: Wolfgang
- Re: lu dsik layout
- From: Tim Bradshaw
- lu dsik layout
- Prev by Date: SCSI error for Solaris 10 x86 5/08?
- Next by Date: Doesn't POST after LOM host power on
- Previous by thread: Re: lu dsik layout
- Next by thread: solaris 10, openssl, rsa and aes256
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading