Re: Blastwave dead?
- From: Thomas Glanzmann <sithglan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 8 Oct 2008 04:49:56 GMT
Hello,
Getting some substitute for Blastwave running should not be too
difficult. As I see it, the only real problem is who's going to pay
for the bandwidth. I think we are talking about something like "T1"
service here and, the last time I looked, T1 cost something like
$700/month. That's a real killer!
there is this new technology called ,,rsync''. You can run the main
blastwave mirror from my dsl account at home, that I have anyway for the
total amount of 50 ¤ / month. But the thing is the main mirror of
blastwave (now called opencsw.org) is intact and very well connected
(30Mb/s and more). And Dennis user account seems to be removed which
means that we don't have to recover the content from backups in the
future.
Thomas
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Blastwave dead?
- From: Ian Collins
- Re: Blastwave dead?
- References:
- Re: Blastwave dead?
- From: Dick Hoogendijk
- Re: Blastwave dead?
- From: doofus
- Re: Blastwave dead?
- From: David Combs
- Re: Blastwave dead?
- From: Richard B. Gilbert
- Re: Blastwave dead?
- From: Richard B. Gilbert
- Re: Blastwave dead?
- From: Willie
- Re: Blastwave dead?
- From: Richard B. Gilbert
- Re: Blastwave dead?
- Prev by Date: Re: Mounting USB disks Solaris 10 x86 11/06
- Next by Date: Re: Blastwave dead?
- Previous by thread: Re: Blastwave dead?
- Next by thread: Re: Blastwave dead?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|