Re: Needing advice about ZFS and SAN LUNs
- From: "Heinz Müller" <onkelheinz@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 22:41:15 +0200
"Richard B. Gilbert" <rgilbert88@xxxxxxxxxxx> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
news:4bidnYHobrLrb5zXnZ2dnUVZ_hKdnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Heinz Müller wrote:
Hi,
I've got three 50GB SAN LUNs from an EMC box.
Within the EMC Box the three LUNs were generated from a RAID-5.
For my database ( SYBASE ) I need about 40GB.
My first thought was to take a complete LUN in a zpool
and generate different ZFS volumes for my database.
However, my colleague advises me, to create a slice of about
13GB on each LUN and put them together to a zpool to
get about 40GB for my database. He's understanding is that
the I/O throughput should be better.
I'm not familiar with ZFS so I would like to know which
of the two ways is the better one, because at the end of the day
all I/O is generated in the RAID-5 of the EMC Box.
Thanks!
Heinz
You didn't say what database you are using so I will assume Oracle.
"For my database ( SYBASE ) I need about 40GB."
It's SYBASE.
"Software RAID on top of hardware RAID may have some performance problems"
I need a Volume Manager (ZFS ) because it's an cluster environment.
Heinz
.
- References:
- Needing advice about ZFS and SAN LUNs
- From: Heinz Müller
- Re: Needing advice about ZFS and SAN LUNs
- From: Richard B. Gilbert
- Needing advice about ZFS and SAN LUNs
- Prev by Date: Re: Needing advice about ZFS and SAN LUNs
- Next by Date: Re: Needing advice about ZFS and SAN LUNs
- Previous by thread: Re: Needing advice about ZFS and SAN LUNs
- Next by thread: Re: Needing advice about ZFS and SAN LUNs
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading