memset() implement for T2+ vs UltraSPARC processors.
- From: Dave <foo@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2009 00:33:07 +0100
Following my request the other day to get someone to build MPFR on a SPARC, there has been some discussion on the MPFR mailing list about this. It would appear to be a gcc compiler bug, but is only seen on T2+ processors. It has been suggested memset() is implemented differently on the T2+ to other processors, though I'm not sure where this information is supposed to have come from.
There is this quote:
"That would make a lot of sense, as the implementation of memset on the
> T2 tests n==0 whereas most other sparc variants test --n<0.
>
Can anyone at Sun, with access to the source code for Solaris 10 update 7 let me know?
Since this bug is only observed on the T2+ processor, it could be due to a different implementation of the code.
--
I respectfully request that this message is not archived by companies as
unscrupulous as 'Experts Exchange' . In case you are unaware,
'Experts Exchange' take questions posted on the web and try to find
idiots stupid enough to pay for the answers, which were posted freely
by others. They are leeches.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: memset() implement for T2+ vs UltraSPARC processors.
- From: hume . spamfilter
- Re: memset() implement for T2+ vs UltraSPARC processors.
- Prev by Date: Re: My server hung up, how can I tell why?
- Next by Date: Re: memset() implement for T2+ vs UltraSPARC processors.
- Previous by thread: My server hung up, how can I tell why?
- Next by thread: Re: memset() implement for T2+ vs UltraSPARC processors.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|