Re: dhcpagent + ipfilter := delayed loss of IP functionality?
- From: hume.spamfilter@xxxxxxx
- Date: Sat, 16 Jan 2010 17:36:51 +0000 (UTC)
Richard B. Gilbert <rgilbert88@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Do you really NEED ipfilter? My router, by default, will not allow any
incoming packet to pass unless it is a response to outgoing traffic.
Pretty much anyone using Solaris in any form of server role isn't going to
find that feasible.
--
Brandon Hume - hume -> BOFH.Ca, http://WWW.BOFH.Ca/
.
- References:
- dhcpagent + ipfilter := delayed loss of IP functionality?
- From: Jeroen Scheerder
- Re: dhcpagent + ipfilter := delayed loss of IP functionality?
- From: Oscar del Rio
- Re: dhcpagent + ipfilter := delayed loss of IP functionality?
- From: Jeroen Scheerder
- Re: dhcpagent + ipfilter := delayed loss of IP functionality?
- From: hume . spamfilter
- Re: dhcpagent + ipfilter := delayed loss of IP functionality?
- From: Jeroen Scheerder
- Re: dhcpagent + ipfilter := delayed loss of IP functionality?
- From: hume . spamfilter
- Re: dhcpagent + ipfilter := delayed loss of IP functionality?
- From: Jeroen Scheerder
- Re: dhcpagent + ipfilter := delayed loss of IP functionality?
- From: Richard B. Gilbert
- dhcpagent + ipfilter := delayed loss of IP functionality?
- Prev by Date: Re: dhcpagent + ipfilter := delayed loss of IP functionality?
- Next by Date: Re: dhcpagent + ipfilter := delayed loss of IP functionality?
- Previous by thread: Re: dhcpagent + ipfilter := delayed loss of IP functionality?
- Next by thread: Re: dhcpagent + ipfilter := delayed loss of IP functionality?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|