Re: Oracle changed the Solaris license terms?
- From: Canuck57 <Canuck57@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2010 18:11:59 -0600
On 20/03/2010 4:35 PM, Michael Laajanen wrote:
Hi,
Ian Collins wrote:
On 03/21/10 10:25 AM, Chris Ridd wrote:Well, not everything can be free on the world, Sun did not perform wellOn 2010-03-20 20:28:12 +0000, Ian Collins said:
On 03/21/10 09:18 AM, Non scrivetemi wrote:Hi,Um, the licensing information (from
Is Solaris now only a 30 day trial and after that you have to pay? Or
can
you still download and use Solaris on x86 for free?
http://www.sun.com/software/solaris/get.jsp) now says:
"Please remember, your right to use Solaris acquired as a download is
limited to a trial of 90 days, unless you acquire a service contract
for the downloaded Software."
Does anyone have a copy of what it used to say?
The wayback machine (running on Solaris or OpenSolaris IIRC) shows the
page in 2008
<http://web.archive.org/web/20080614035850/http://www.sun.com/software/solaris/popup.jsp?info=17>.
It just says you must have an entitlement doc.
So the last sentence I quoted has been tacked on the end. Sneaky.
and something at Sun must change in order to make money doesn't it?
I have always seen Solaris in as RedHat and OpenSolaris as Fedora.
Organisations should pay for the license, personal use of a Enterprise
SW should be free IMHO.
/Michael
Couldn't agree more. While an organization should pay reasonable for a technology, it is cost prohibitive for many of us to pay retail to run this stuff. And by running it say at home, learning it, making skills available to businesses to use it... there is the value. As businesses are not going to shell out for technologoes that need full time @ $250/hr++ from Sun/Oracle. Might be ok to start for some with deep pockets, but not for most.
Oracle has been successful squeezing the $$$ out of clients, but at some point their model will be deemed over priced.
--
--------------
Politicians don't provide anything, the tax payers do.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Oracle changed the Solaris license terms?
- From: Richard B. Gilbert
- Re: Oracle changed the Solaris license terms?
- References:
- Oracle changed the Solaris license terms?
- From: Non scrivetemi
- Re: Oracle changed the Solaris license terms?
- From: Ian Collins
- Re: Oracle changed the Solaris license terms?
- From: Chris Ridd
- Re: Oracle changed the Solaris license terms?
- From: Ian Collins
- Re: Oracle changed the Solaris license terms?
- From: Michael Laajanen
- Oracle changed the Solaris license terms?
- Prev by Date: Re: Oracle changed the Solaris license terms?
- Next by Date: Re: Oracle changed the Solaris license terms?
- Previous by thread: Re: Oracle changed the Solaris license terms?
- Next by thread: Re: Oracle changed the Solaris license terms?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|