What version of GLIBC?
From: DiskMan (nobody_at_thewheel.com)
Date: 04/06/05
- Next message: UNIX pSyChO: "Re: Compaq C"
- Previous message: DiskMan: "Re: Compaq C"
- In reply to: UNIX pSyChO: "Re: Compaq C"
- Next in thread: DiskMan: "Re: Compaq C - Found the ANSWER to the glibc header/ccc problem..."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2005 21:50:15 GMT
I was also wondering, what version of GLIBC did the guy use? My install of
CCC tends to go ape *** over GLIBC-2.1/2.3.2 headers... Will L G
"UNIX pSyChO" <marco@unixpsycho.com> wrote in message
news:9c1ei2-64h.ln1@xsssvr.xssnet.com...
> DiskMan wrote:
> > I was wondering, when is the next itineration of Compaq C going to be
> > released for Alpha Linux? Why do I ask, well CCC-6.5.9 is so anal
retentive
> > its not even funny. Only the most basic and simplest of programs can be
> > compiled with it. Personally I would LONG to compile something like
Gnome
> > with it [I know thats most likely a pipe dream.]... Will L G
> >
> >
>
> i dont think it's that bad... someone a while ago compiled KDE using CCC.
>
> --
>
> BOFH excuse #445: The cause of the problem is: Mailer-daemon is busy
> burning your message in hell.
- Next message: UNIX pSyChO: "Re: Compaq C"
- Previous message: DiskMan: "Re: Compaq C"
- In reply to: UNIX pSyChO: "Re: Compaq C"
- Next in thread: DiskMan: "Re: Compaq C - Found the ANSWER to the glibc header/ccc problem..."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]